Install Theme

Your web-browser is very outdated, and as such, this website may not display properly. Please consider upgrading to a modern, faster and more secure browser. Click here to do so.

Light 'em up

hi this is demiurge!! I'm a 17 year old who posts a clusterfuck of shit
Sep 30 '14

yumbles:

while i’m at it, here’s the second piece in the magical-girls-with-food series!

sweet cars?! coffee??? hot date by the beach?? my dreams.

Sep 30 '14

assbutt-in-the-garrison:

the-goddamazon:

malahua:

standwithpalestine:

(via Hala Ali)

YAS MARK UNPROBLEMATIQUE WHITE FAVE

Keep in mind he is still on the FBI’s “terrorist watch” list too.

I love him so much

(Source: standwithpalestine)

Sep 30 '14
ghdos:

marfmellow:

luvyourselfsomeesteem:

DONE SAID IT.

GO THE FUCK IN. 

No lies.

ghdos:

marfmellow:

luvyourselfsomeesteem:

DONE SAID IT.

GO THE FUCK IN. 

No lies.

Sep 30 '14
"

I’ve said this before and I’ll point it out again -

Menstruation is caused by change in hormonal levels to stop the creation of a uterine lining and encourage the body to flush the lining out. The body does this by lowering estrogen levels and raising testosterone.

Or, to put it more plainly “That time of the month” is when female hormones most closely resemble male hormones. So if (cis) women aren’t suited to office at “That time of the month” then (cis) men are NEVER suited to office.

If you are a dude and don’t dig the ladies around you at their time of the month, just think! That is you all of the time.

And, on a final note, post-menopausal (cis) women are the most hormonally stable of all human demographics. They have fewer hormonal fluctuations of anyone, meaning older women like Hilary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren would theoretically be among the least likely candidates to make an irrational decision due to hormonal fluctuations, and if we were basing our leadership decisions on hormone levels, then only women over fifty should ever be allowed to hold office.

"

timemachineyeah (via ask-pauli-amorous)

Eat THAT, hormone-snipers!

(via tamorapierce)

Sep 30 '14
freshest-tittymilk:

portraits-of-america:

     “I got both of them from local shelters. When I got her in 2006, the staff told me she was a shepherd husky. I go to the dog park, I’m meeting people with shepherd husky mixes, and they look nothing like her. I get in my car, I’m driving, I look in the rearview mirror, I see these eyes and I’m like, I’ve got a wolf in my car. Then, when she was 10-months old, there was a shepherd breeder and trainer in the dog park, and at the end of the lesson, the trainer came up to me and asked, ‘What kind of dog is that?’ And I’m thinking, Shepherd husky. You should know, you are a breeder. She said, ‘That’s a wolf.’”  
Bethlehem, PA
 

Thats mildly hilarious

freshest-tittymilk:

portraits-of-america:

     “I got both of them from local shelters. When I got her in 2006, the staff told me she was a shepherd husky. I go to the dog park, I’m meeting people with shepherd husky mixes, and they look nothing like her. I get in my car, I’m driving, I look in the rearview mirror, I see these eyes and I’m like, I’ve got a wolf in my car. Then, when she was 10-months old, there was a shepherd breeder and trainer in the dog park, and at the end of the lesson, the trainer came up to me and asked, ‘What kind of dog is that?’ And I’m thinking, Shepherd husky. You should know, you are a breeder. She said, ‘That’s a wolf.’” 

Bethlehem, PA

 

Thats mildly hilarious

Sep 30 '14
talesof4chan:

Anon has a burglar break intalesof4chan.tumblr.com

talesof4chan:

Anon has a burglar break in
talesof4chan.tumblr.com

Sep 30 '14

satanicvaginas:

IM CRYING BC THE ACCURACY HITS DEEP

(Source: trinitymemes)

Sep 30 '14

damegreywulf:

trust:

i want a relationship but i want them to be like a friend to me, i dont want the relationship to be all about kissing, making out and sex i just wanna hang out with them, and go places, and just have fun wherever we go

This post is surreal because that is exactly how a healthy relationship should be yet we’re convinced this is a weird and unusual thing to ask of our partners.

(Source: trust)

Sep 30 '14
hi-coup:

cloudcuckoolander527:

yayfeminism:

One would assume that scientists, who are trained to think objectively, are completely immune to gender discrimination. However, a recent Yale study by Corinne Moss-Racusin and colleagues suggests otherwise.
The researchers created a fictional student and sent out the student’s application to science professors at top, research-intensive universities in the United States. The professors were asked to evaluate how competent this student was, how likely they would be to hire the student, how much they would pay this student, and how willing they would be to mentor the student. All of the applications sent out were identical, except for the fact that half were for a male applicant, John, and half were for a female applicant, Jennifer. Results showed that, with statistical significance, both male and female faculty at these institutions were biased towards male students over female students.
Data from the study shows that on average, science faculty was willing to pay the male applicant about $4,000 more per year. source

"The gender gap doesn’t exist" 
"We don’t need feminism" 
"Maybe he just worked harder"
"*any MRA bullshit*"

I had to read this study for class. It is thorough as fuck.

hi-coup:

cloudcuckoolander527:

yayfeminism:

One would assume that scientists, who are trained to think objectively, are completely immune to gender discrimination. However, a recent Yale study by Corinne Moss-Racusin and colleagues suggests otherwise.

The researchers created a fictional student and sent out the student’s application to science professors at top, research-intensive universities in the United States. The professors were asked to evaluate how competent this student was, how likely they would be to hire the student, how much they would pay this student, and how willing they would be to mentor the student. All of the applications sent out were identical, except for the fact that half were for a male applicant, John, and half were for a female applicant, Jennifer. Results showed that, with statistical significance, both male and female faculty at these institutions were biased towards male students over female students.

Data from the study shows that on average, science faculty was willing to pay the male applicant about $4,000 more per year. 
source

"The gender gap doesn’t exist" 

"We don’t need feminism" 

"Maybe he just worked harder"

"*any MRA bullshit*"

I had to read this study for class. It is thorough as fuck.

Sep 30 '14

vvni:

Men and Women, stages of fear

Sep 30 '14
nonbinarykits:

defilerwyrm:

Non-English classifications of angel in singular and plural, because if I read one more line about “a seraphim” I’m gonna smack somebody with a brick.

What. “Non-English” are you serious? Can you not even mention languages here? I am going to give you a quick lesson about Hebrew and Angels, since you clearly do not know about it properly.
Ar’el/Arel/Er’el: the attested forms of Erelim as part of the Jewish angelic hierarchy are largely based on Christian interpretations of doctrine; ‘erelim’ is most commonly translated as valiant men or heroes rather than some reference to angels. אראלם exists only once in the scriptures and is therefore a very shaky word to base your proof of angelic hierarchies on. This exists mostly in strains of Jewish Qabbala and Christianity. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you are operating with Maimonides’ texts, so fine: erelim can be part of the angelic hierarchy. However, typing “ar’el” is just plain ridiculous looking. There is no “ar’el” unless you wish to type it as 'ar'el—that ’ is denoting nothing more than an alef, which for you would probably be pronounced silently. And for those of us who articulate the glottal stop (many Mizrahim/Sfaradim), we would just type arel or erel, because we know what we are referring to. We don’t call people ‘Ari’el, for G-d’s sake.
Cherub: Depending on what dialect of Hebrew we are referring to here, this is not pronounced “cherub” at all. It is pronounced “keruv” or “kerub.” The plural form is “keruvim” or “kerubim.” So no, this is exactly an English version (based on a Latin corruption) with a pseudo-Hebrew suffix added. We don’t say cherubim because that is not a word. Anyway, they rank low on Maimonides’ angelic hierarchy (9) whereas erelim rank at 3. Why link them together?
Elohim: No! No, no no. I am actually laughing at you. “Elohim” is used as a singular when referring to G-d. For godly beings we say “elohim,” correct, but there is no singular for “godly being” and all uses of Elohim with singular verbs refer solely to G-d. There is no agreed upon singular form for elohim in the way of referring to godly beings . Sorry, but here you are very wrong.
Mal’akh/Malak: Here, again you go with the ridiculous [‘] every two seconds. Why do you type this way? No one who speaks Hebrew types this way, especially so…inconsistently, unless it is to separate consonants or some other good reason. Anyway, Malakim are G-d’s messengers and this is one of the few that you didn’t mess up aside from the [‘].
Naphil/Nephil: No. There is no “nephil” or “naphil.” These are not part of any angelic hierarchy, period. Christians—interpreters of our scripture without actually consulting any of us on the meanings—sometimes refer to these as fallen angels, but this isn’t true. The word usually refers to a giant. At best this is the view of some more obscure and ancient Jewish sects, but there have been myth-writers in Judaism longer than Christianity has existed. Truly if you believe nefilim (the proper term) to be angels, then so are refaim and emim, I suppose.
Ophan/Ofan: Correct.
Seraph: Actually, the correct singular of serafim is “saraf,” not “seraf.” Sometimes vowels change in the root depending on what the plural form is, so “seraph” is just not the proper term unless you are…not speaking Hebrew. In which case, you would not say serafim, you would say seraphi or seraphs or something else.
How this should and could have looked, presuming you follow Maimonides:
Hayyot haKodesh (plural form)
Ofan — Ofanim
Erel — Erelim
Hashmal — Hashmalim
Saraf — Serafim (or S’rafim)
Malak — Malakim
Elohim (plural form)
Ben elohim — B’nei elohim/B’nei haElohim
Keruv/kerub — Keruvim/kerubim
Ish/isha — Ishim

nonbinarykits:

defilerwyrm:

Non-English classifications of angel in singular and plural, because if I read one more line about “a seraphim” I’m gonna smack somebody with a brick.

What. “Non-English” are you serious? Can you not even mention languages here? I am going to give you a quick lesson about Hebrew and Angels, since you clearly do not know about it properly.

Ar’el/Arel/Er’el: the attested forms of Erelim as part of the Jewish angelic hierarchy are largely based on Christian interpretations of doctrine; ‘erelim’ is most commonly translated as valiant men or heroes rather than some reference to angels. אראלם exists only once in the scriptures and is therefore a very shaky word to base your proof of angelic hierarchies on. This exists mostly in strains of Jewish Qabbala and Christianity. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you are operating with Maimonides’ texts, so fine: erelim can be part of the angelic hierarchy. However, typing “ar’el” is just plain ridiculous looking. There is no “ar’el” unless you wish to type it as 'ar'el—that ’ is denoting nothing more than an alef, which for you would probably be pronounced silently. And for those of us who articulate the glottal stop (many Mizrahim/Sfaradim), we would just type arel or erel, because we know what we are referring to. We don’t call people ‘Ari’el, for G-d’s sake.

Cherub: Depending on what dialect of Hebrew we are referring to here, this is not pronounced “cherub” at all. It is pronounced “keruv” or “kerub.” The plural form is “keruvim” or “kerubim.” So no, this is exactly an English version (based on a Latin corruption) with a pseudo-Hebrew suffix added. We don’t say cherubim because that is not a word. Anyway, they rank low on Maimonides’ angelic hierarchy (9) whereas erelim rank at 3. Why link them together?

Elohim: No! No, no no. I am actually laughing at you. “Elohim” is used as a singular when referring to G-d. For godly beings we say “elohim,” correct, but there is no singular for “godly being” and all uses of Elohim with singular verbs refer solely to G-d. There is no agreed upon singular form for elohim in the way of referring to godly beings . Sorry, but here you are very wrong.

Mal’akh/Malak: Here, again you go with the ridiculous [‘] every two seconds. Why do you type this way? No one who speaks Hebrew types this way, especially so…inconsistently, unless it is to separate consonants or some other good reason. Anyway, Malakim are G-d’s messengers and this is one of the few that you didn’t mess up aside from the [‘].

Naphil/Nephil: No. There is no “nephil” or “naphil.” These are not part of any angelic hierarchy, period. Christians—interpreters of our scripture without actually consulting any of us on the meanings—sometimes refer to these as fallen angels, but this isn’t true. The word usually refers to a giant. At best this is the view of some more obscure and ancient Jewish sects, but there have been myth-writers in Judaism longer than Christianity has existed. Truly if you believe nefilim (the proper term) to be angels, then so are refaim and emim, I suppose.

Ophan/Ofan: Correct.

Seraph: Actually, the correct singular of serafim is “saraf,” not “seraf.” Sometimes vowels change in the root depending on what the plural form is, so “seraph” is just not the proper term unless you are…not speaking Hebrew. In which case, you would not say serafim, you would say seraphi or seraphs or something else.

How this should and could have looked, presuming you follow Maimonides:

  1. Hayyot haKodesh (plural form)
  2. Ofan — Ofanim
  3. Erel — Erelim
  4. Hashmal — Hashmalim
  5. Saraf — Serafim (or S’rafim)
  6. Malak — Malakim
  7. Elohim (plural form)
  8. Ben elohim — B’nei elohim/B’nei haElohim
  9. Keruv/kerub — Keruvim/kerubim
  10. Ish/isha — Ishim
Sep 30 '14
scribbleowl:

sango-hentaitenshi:

necktie-nyxeth:

longleggedgit:


r-dart:


Now you know the truth of what’s going through my mind at parties.


oh my gosh the last panel actually made me tear up


gpoy

I can’t tell you how accurate this is

This is a really good depiction of social anxiety because it focuses on inner states rather then outward actions. As someone very good at concealing his anxiety, I appreciate it.

scribbleowl:

sango-hentaitenshi:

necktie-nyxeth:

longleggedgit:

r-dart:

Now you know the truth of what’s going through my mind at parties.

oh my gosh the last panel actually made me tear up

gpoy

I can’t tell you how accurate this is

This is a really good depiction of social anxiety because it focuses on inner states rather then outward actions. As someone very good at concealing his anxiety, I appreciate it.

Sep 30 '14
baeddeldeerfeet:

thesuperfeyneednoshoes:

the-king-in-yellow:

ninjabikeslut:

"Facial-recognition technology is quickly becoming a mainstay of commercial and government surveillance systems. While it can provide benefits in automation and security, it is also a threat to privacy. Sophisticated algorithms can already extract information about your gender, age and even mood from a single image, and then link those physical attributes to commercial or government databases."-Face to Anti-Face

The most cyberpunk post on this website, possibly ever. 

For future reference.

the cyber revolution is literally coming upon us
shadowrun fashion suddenly makes so much sense

baeddeldeerfeet:

thesuperfeyneednoshoes:

the-king-in-yellow:

ninjabikeslut:

"Facial-recognition technology is quickly becoming a mainstay of commercial and government surveillance systems. While it can provide benefits in automation and security, it is also a threat to privacy. Sophisticated algorithms can already extract information about your gender, age and even mood from a single image, and then link those physical attributes to commercial or government databases."
-Face to Anti-Face

The most cyberpunk post on this website, possibly ever. 

For future reference.

the cyber revolution is literally coming upon us

shadowrun fashion suddenly makes so much sense

Sep 29 '14

itsstuckyinmyhead:

Tumblr Loves Halloween 

Sep 29 '14

kenway:

uzujusttoodamnfresh:

tiny-green-box:

kenway:

the southern US genuinely scares me like my map of ‘states i will willingly go to for college’ looks more or less like

image

if you’re coming to the us this is a good travel guide fyi <3

thats pretty ignorant tbh 

so are the racist and prejudiced people who live in those areas